Sunday, September 26, 2010

There’s a case to be made, of course, that soccer is uniquely adapted for the creation of Federer Moments. Unlike tennis, which augments the player’s physical capabilities with a racket, soccer takes an essential physical tool—the hands—away from the player and forces him to compete in a state of artificial clumsiness. Soccer thus emphasizes the limits of the body and the difficulty of realizing intention. When a player does something amazing, we’re apt to see it not as a superhuman feat (he made the ball travel 150mph!), but as a human victory over what’s essentially an everyday difficulty. If the crisis of having a body is that it’s resistant to our will, soccer exaggerates the crisis, moves what you want to do even further away from what you can do, then gives us athletes who do what they want to anyway. That may be why moments of beauty in soccer, compared to those in other sports, nearly always feel like consolations.

-Run of Play essaying Pele and David Foster Wallace is good

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

DFW sure got his body out of the way of said clumsiness...so I'm the bad guy, right?

Good media culling, Goats. I tend to view the NYT Magazine as a surfeit, something like, I don't know, a vaporizer. I've heard its good but I only experience it when other people bring it over? But then that doesn't hold up, metaphorically, what with the proprietary nature of my recent vaping, etc...